linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 0/4] Add camera clock controller support for SM8550

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <feebd8cd-7713-f086-356b-cc2657a9708e@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 13 Jun 2023 10:37:30 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
        Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
        Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>,
        Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
        Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/4] Add camera clock controller support for SM8550

On 12/06/2023 04:25, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 09/06/2023 12:50, Jagadeesh Kona wrote:
>> Add bindings, driver and devicetree node for camera clock controller on
>> SM8550.
> 
> This is very confusing.
> 
> Your cover letter doesn't detail any changes and your individual patches 
> all say "no changes since v3", "no changes since v2"
> 
> If this is a RESEND then mark it as a RESEND.

That's indeed odd. Three versions without changes...

Best regards,
Krzysztof