[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1bfc8c1d-f49a-2128-a457-4651832f3d2a@veeam.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 11:03:49 +0200
From: Sergei Shtepa <sergei.shtepa@...am.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: <axboe@...nel.dk>, <corbet@....net>, <snitzer@...nel.org>,
<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, <brauner@...nel.org>,
<willy@...radead.org>, <dlemoal@...nel.org>, <wsa@...nel.org>,
<heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>, <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] blksnap - block devices snapshots module
On 6/12/23 05:49, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Sergei,
>
> what tree does this apply to? New block infrastructure and drivers
> should be against Jen's for-6.5/block tree, and trying to apply the
> series against that seems to fail in patch 1 already.
>
Hi.
Thank you. My mistake is that for the base branch I used this:
Link: https://github.com/torvalds/linux
> Jen's for-6.5/block tree
Link: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/log/?h=for-6.5/block
I have to prepare a patch for this branch.
I'm sorry if I remind you of a kitten who is just learning how to
properly lap milk from a bowl :)
I guess I don't need to increment the patch version.
Is it enough to do a "RESEND"?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists