linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] blksnap - block devices snapshots module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2023061204-jigsaw-punch-0e6a@gregkh>
Date:   Mon, 12 Jun 2023 11:23:19 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Sergei Shtepa <sergei.shtepa@...am.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, axboe@...nel.dk,
        corbet@....net, snitzer@...nel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        brauner@...nel.org, willy@...radead.org, dlemoal@...nel.org,
        wsa@...nel.org, heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
        ming.lei@...hat.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] blksnap - block devices snapshots module

On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:03:49AM +0200, Sergei Shtepa wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/12/23 05:49, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Hi Sergei,
> > 
> > what tree does this apply to?  New block infrastructure and drivers
> > should be against Jen's for-6.5/block tree, and trying to apply the
> > series against that seems to fail in patch 1 already.
> > 
> 
> Hi.
> 
> Thank you. My mistake is that for the base branch I used this:
> Link: https://github.com/torvalds/linux
> 
> > Jen's for-6.5/block tree
> Link: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/log/?h=for-6.5/block
> I have to prepare a patch for this branch.
> 
> I'm sorry if I remind you of a kitten who is just learning how to
> properly lap milk from a bowl :)
> 
> I guess I don't need to increment the patch version.
> Is it enough to do a "RESEND"?

It's a new version as you had to rebase it.

thanks,

greg k-h