linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] scripts/rust_is_available: Fix clang version check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4a1096e9-500e-d764-0a79-289e6559cfb1@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Jun 2023 13:44:30 -0300
From:   Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@...il.com>
To:     "Ethan D. Twardy" <ethan.twardy@...il.com>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
        Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
        Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, Tiago Lam <tiagolam@...il.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Finn Behrens <me@...enk.de>,
        "open list:RUST" <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:CLANG/LLVM BUILD SUPPORT" <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] scripts/rust_is_available: Fix clang version check

On 6/14/23 09:08, Ethan D. Twardy wrote:
> Greetings, Martin!
> 
> Thanks very much for your testing and review. Do I need to take any
> further action to make this patch ready for review? I sent out a v3
> version of the patch, where the only change was adding Reviewed-By and
> Tested-By tags to my git commit--since this is my first time
> contributing to this community, I wasn't sure whether I needed to do
> that. Thanks!
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> Ethan Twardy

Unless other reviewers requested changes, you have to rebase your
work or you want to make a modification, it is not necessary to send a
new version of the patch series, generally, maintainers will, and have
to, add any Reviewed-bys or Tested-bys prior to merging.