lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230614114339.zhuhij6vobdnbse5@intel.intel>
Date:   Wed, 14 Jun 2023 13:43:39 +0200
From:   Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To:     Wang Ming <machel@...o.com>
Cc:     Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@...co.com>,
        Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, opensource.kernel@...o.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drivers/i2c/muxes:Fix resource leaks in
 device_for_each_child_node() loops

Hi Wang,

> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
> index 5d5cbe013..90966de7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
> @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_fw(struct gpiomux *mux,
>                 } else if (is_acpi_node(child)) {
>                         rc = acpi_get_local_address(ACPI_HANDLE_FWNODE(child), values + i);
>                         if (rc)
> +                               fwnode_handle_put(child);
>                                 return dev_err_probe(dev, rc, "Cannot get address\n");
>                 }

please, read it again and tell me what's wrong :)

Andi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ