[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230614114339.zhuhij6vobdnbse5@intel.intel>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 13:43:39 +0200
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Wang Ming <machel@...o.com>
Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@...co.com>,
Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, opensource.kernel@...o.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drivers/i2c/muxes:Fix resource leaks in
device_for_each_child_node() loops
Hi Wang,
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
> index 5d5cbe013..90966de7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
> @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_fw(struct gpiomux *mux,
> } else if (is_acpi_node(child)) {
> rc = acpi_get_local_address(ACPI_HANDLE_FWNODE(child), values + i);
> if (rc)
> + fwnode_handle_put(child);
> return dev_err_probe(dev, rc, "Cannot get address\n");
> }
please, read it again and tell me what's wrong :)
Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists