[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <266de9f5-826a-c1bf-be8d-11f5e27c87dc@foss.st.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 17:19:22 +0200
From: Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@...s.st.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...s.st.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>,
Xiang wangx <wangxiang@...rlc.com>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: mmc: mmci: Add st,stm32mp25-sdmmc2
compatible
On 6/15/23 17:16, Yann Gautier wrote:
> On 6/15/23 15:20, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 at 11:20, Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@...s.st.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> For STM32MP25, we'll need to distinguish how is managed the delay block.
>>> This is done through a new comptible dedicated for this SoC, as the
>>> delay block registers are located in SYSCFG peripheral.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@...s.st.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml | 6 ++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml
>>> index 1c96da04f0e53..e47b3418b6c77 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml
>>> @@ -59,6 +59,12 @@ properties:
>>> - const: st,stm32-sdmmc2
>>> - const: arm,pl18x
>>> - const: arm,primecell
>>> + - description: Entry for STMicroelectronics variant of PL18x for
>>> + STM32MP25. This dedicated compatible is used by bootloaders.
>>
>> What does this last sentence mean? Can we drop it?
>
> Hi Ulf,
>
> I just copied (and added "for STM32MP25") what was done for STM32MP1x:
> - description: Entry for STMicroelectronics variant of PL18x.
> This dedicated compatible is used by bootloaders.
> items:
> - const: st,stm32-sdmmc2
> - const: arm,pl18x
> - const: arm,primecell
> - description: Entry for STMicroelectronics variant of PL18x for
> STM32MP25. This dedicated compatible is used by bootloaders.
> items:
> - const: st,stm32mp25-sdmmc2
> - const: arm,pl18x
> - const: arm,primecell
>
>
> Should I remove (or adapt) both descriptions?
>
>
> Best regards,
> Yann
>
At the time the patch was done it was really just used by bootloaders.
But as it is now used in the driver for delay block, I should remove the
second sentence.
Yann
>>
>>> + items:
>>> + - const: st,stm32mp25-sdmmc2
>>> + - const: arm,pl18x
>>> + - const: arm,primecell
>>>
>>> clocks:
>>> description: One or two clocks, the "apb_pclk" and the "MCLK"
>>> --
>>> 2.25.1
>>>
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Uffe
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists