[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230615152031.GCZIssPyJjGcikn9iA@fat_crate.local>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 17:20:31 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Cc: linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tony.luck@...el.com, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Schedule mce_setup() on correct CPU for CPER
decoding
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 04:20:06PM +0000, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> @@ -97,20 +102,13 @@ int apei_smca_report_x86_error(struct cper_ia_proc_ctx *ctx_info, u64 lapic_id)
> if (ctx_info->reg_arr_size < 48)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - mce_setup(&m);
> -
> - m.extcpu = -1;
> - m.socketid = -1;
> -
> - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - if (cpu_data(cpu).initial_apicid == lapic_id) {
> - m.extcpu = cpu;
> - m.socketid = cpu_data(m.extcpu).phys_proc_id;
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> + if (cpu_data(cpu).initial_apicid == lapic_id)
> break;
> - }
> - }
>
> - m.apicid = lapic_id;
> + if (smp_call_function_single(cpu, __mce_setup, &m, 1))
I can see the following call-chain from NMI context which is a no-no:
ghes_notify_nmi
|-> ghes_in_nmi_spool_from_list
|-> ghes_in_nmi_queue_one_entry
|-> __ghes_panic
|-> __ghes_print_estatus
|-> cper_estatus_print
|-> cper_estatus_print_section
|-> cper_print_proc_ia
|-> arch_apei_report_x86_error
|-> apei_smca_report_x86_error
|-> smp_call_function_single
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists