[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fs6tflfi.fsf@mail.lhotse>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 13:34:25 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder@...cle.com>, linux@...linux.org.uk,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, chenhuacai@...nel.org,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, tsbogend@...ha.franken.de,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, deller@....de,
ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp, dalias@...c.org,
glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, 86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel@...0n.name, npiggin@...il.com, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com,
svens@...ux.ibm.com, hpa@...or.com, keescook@...omium.org,
paulmck@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, frederic@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ardb@...nel.org,
samitolvanen@...gle.com, juerg.haefliger@...onical.com,
arnd@...db.de, rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, sebastian.reichel@...labora.com,
rppt@...nel.org, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
anshuman.khandual@....com, ziy@...dia.com, masahiroy@...nel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, mhiramat@...nel.org, ojeda@...nel.org,
thunder.leizhen@...wei.com, xin3.li@...el.com, tj@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, tsi@...oix.net, bhe@...hat.com,
hbathini@...ux.ibm.com, sourabhjain@...ux.ibm.com,
eric.devolder@...cle.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 10/21] powerpc/kexec: refactor for kernel/Kconfig.kexec
Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder@...cle.com> writes:
> The kexec and crash kernel options are provided in the common
> kernel/Kconfig.kexec. Utilize the common options and provide
> the ARCH_HAS_ and ARCH_SUPPORTS_ entries to recreate the
> equivalent set of KEXEC and CRASH options.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder@...cle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 55 ++++++++++++++------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> index bff5820b7cda..36f2fe0cc8a5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> @@ -588,41 +588,21 @@ config PPC64_SUPPORTS_MEMORY_FAILURE
> default "y" if PPC_POWERNV
> select ARCH_SUPPORTS_MEMORY_FAILURE
>
> -config KEXEC
> - bool "kexec system call"
> - depends on PPC_BOOK3S || PPC_E500 || (44x && !SMP)
> - select KEXEC_CORE
> - help
> - kexec is a system call that implements the ability to shutdown your
> - current kernel, and to start another kernel. It is like a reboot
> - but it is independent of the system firmware. And like a reboot
> - you can start any kernel with it, not just Linux.
> -
> - The name comes from the similarity to the exec system call.
> -
> - It is an ongoing process to be certain the hardware in a machine
> - is properly shutdown, so do not be surprised if this code does not
> - initially work for you. As of this writing the exact hardware
> - interface is strongly in flux, so no good recommendation can be
> - made.
> -
> -config KEXEC_FILE
> - bool "kexec file based system call"
> - select KEXEC_CORE
> - select HAVE_IMA_KEXEC if IMA
> - select KEXEC_ELF
> - depends on PPC64
> - depends on CRYPTO=y
> - depends on CRYPTO_SHA256=y
...
> +
> +config ARCH_HAS_KEXEC_FILE
> + def_bool PPC64 && CRYPTO && CRYPTO_SHA256
The =y's got lost here.
I think they were both meaningful, because both options are tristate. So
this previously required them to be built-in (=y), whereas after your
patch it will allow them to be modules.
I don't know for sure that those options need to be built-in, but that's
what the code does now, so this patch shouldn't change it, at least
without an explanation.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists