lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c8494676-25f8-72de-3279-70d49b74a91c@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Jun 2023 11:41:58 +0800
From:   Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@...amperecomputing.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        Zhuo Song <zhuo.song@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] perf metric: Event "Compat" value supports
 matching multiple identifiers



在 2023/6/6 上午3:39, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 写道:
> Em Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 10:46:36AM +0800, Jing Zhang escreveu:
>> 在 2023/6/3 上午12:20, John Garry 写道:
>>> On 01/06/2023 09:58, Jing Zhang wrote:
>>>> It can match identifiers "arm_cmn600_{0,1,2..X}" or "arm_cmn650_{0,1,2..X}" or "arm_cmn700_{0,1,2..X}" or "arm_ci700_{ 0,1,2..X}".
>>>> In other words, it can match all identifiers prefixed with “arm_cmn600” or “arm_cmn650” or “arm_cmn700” or “arm_ci700”.
>>>>
>>>> If a new model arm_cmn driver with identifier "arm_cmn750_0", it will not be matched, but if a new revision arm_cmn driver with identifier
>>>> "arm_cmn700_4", it can be matched.
>>>
>>> OK, I see what you mean. My confusion came about though your commit message on this same patch, which did not mention cmn650. I assumed that the example event which you were describing was supported for arm_cmn650 and you intentionally omitted it.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I didn't write cmn650 in the commit message, just because I omitted it. I will add it in a later version.
> 
> Ok, will wait for v4 then.
> 
> - Arnaldo

Hi Arnaldo,

Thank you for following up this patchset, maybe we can merge patch4 to patch7 into your branch first?
They have all been reviewed/acked and there is no dispute. And patch4-7 does not depend on patch1-3,
because patch4-7 is about the metric of ali_drw_pmu, and patch1-3 is about the metric of arm_cmn.
It may take some time for patch1-3 to reach a consensus.

Thanks,
Jing

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ