linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] pinctrl: intel: refine ->irq_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZIrzSoEW7dinDZoi@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Jun 2023 14:17:30 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Jadav, Raag" <raag.jadav@...el.com>
Cc:     "mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com" <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa" 
        <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@...el.com>,
        "N, Pandith" <pandith.n@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] pinctrl: intel: refine ->irq_set_type() hook

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 11:08:38AM +0000, Jadav, Raag wrote:

...

> Should I add all of this in original patch or send this as a separate patch
> on top this series?

Always base the changes on the respective subsystem tree, don't forget to use
--base when formatting patch with Git tools. Then send it separately. The 3rd
patch in the series is questionable to me. I would like to look into it later
on separately.

(The first implies that there is no changes as per this series in that
 function).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko