linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 16/16] nvme: improve handling of long keep alives

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230615113816.649135-16-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 15 Jun 2023 07:38:16 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Uday Shankar <ushankar@...estorage.com>,
        Costa Sapuntzakis <costa@...estorage.com>,
        Randy Jennings <randyj@...estorage.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, sagi@...mberg.me,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 16/16] nvme: improve handling of long keep alives

From: Uday Shankar <ushankar@...estorage.com>

[ Upstream commit c7275ce6a5fd32ca9f5a6294ed89cf0523181af9 ]

Upon keep alive completion, nvme_keep_alive_work is scheduled with the
same delay every time. If keep alive commands are completing slowly,
this may cause a keep alive timeout. The following trace illustrates the
issue, taking KATO = 8 and TBKAS off for simplicity:

1. t = 0: run nvme_keep_alive_work, send keep alive
2. t = ε: keep alive reaches controller, controller restarts its keep
          alive timer
3. t = 4: host receives keep alive completion, schedules
          nvme_keep_alive_work with delay 4
4. t = 8: run nvme_keep_alive_work, send keep alive

Here, a keep alive having RTT of 4 causes a delay of at least 8 - ε
between the controller receiving successive keep alives. With ε small,
the controller is likely to detect a keep alive timeout.

Fix this by calculating the RTT of the keep alive command, and adjusting
the scheduling delay of the next keep alive work accordingly.

Reported-by: Costa Sapuntzakis <costa@...estorage.com>
Reported-by: Randy Jennings <randyj@...estorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@...estorage.com>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 06dd1c0780bfc..4e4203c327114 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -1234,6 +1234,20 @@ static enum rq_end_io_ret nvme_keep_alive_end_io(struct request *rq,
 	struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl = rq->end_io_data;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	bool startka = false;
+	unsigned long rtt = jiffies - (rq->deadline - rq->timeout);
+	unsigned long delay = nvme_keep_alive_work_period(ctrl);
+
+	/*
+	 * Subtract off the keepalive RTT so nvme_keep_alive_work runs
+	 * at the desired frequency.
+	 */
+	if (rtt <= delay) {
+		delay -= rtt;
+	} else {
+		dev_warn(ctrl->device, "long keepalive RTT (%u ms)\n",
+			 jiffies_to_msecs(rtt));
+		delay = 0;
+	}
 
 	blk_mq_free_request(rq);
 
@@ -1252,7 +1266,7 @@ static enum rq_end_io_ret nvme_keep_alive_end_io(struct request *rq,
 		startka = true;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctrl->lock, flags);
 	if (startka)
-		nvme_queue_keep_alive_work(ctrl);
+		queue_delayed_work(nvme_wq, &ctrl->ka_work, delay);
 	return RQ_END_IO_NONE;
 }
 
-- 
2.39.2