lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 16 Jun 2023 07:03:50 -0700
From:   Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>, leit@...com,
        dcostantino@...a.com,
        "open list:PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM" 
        <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM" 
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/amd: Do not WARN on every IRQ

On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 03:29:54PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 04:53:15AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > On some systems, the Performance Counter Global Status Register is
> > coming with reserved bits set, which causes the system to be unusable
> > if a simple `perf top` runs. The system hits the WARN() thousands times
> > while perf runs.
> > 
> > WARNING: CPU: 18 PID: 20608 at arch/x86/events/amd/core.c:944 amd_pmu_v2_handle_irq+0x1be/0x2b0
> > 
> > This happens because the "Performance Counter Global Status Register"
> > (PerfCntGlobalStatus) MSR has bit 7 set. Bit 7 should be reserved according
> > to the documentation (Figure 13-12 from "AMD64 Architecture Programmer’s
> > Manual, Volume 2: System Programming, 24593"[1]
> 
> Would it then not make more sense to mask out bit7 before:

It is more than bit 7. This is the register structure according to the document
above:

Bits 		Mnemonic		Description		 		Access type
63:60	        Reserved RO
59 		PMCF			Performance Counter Freeze		RO
58 		LBRSF			Last Branch Record Stack Freeze 	RO
57:6 		Reserved				 			RO
5:0 		CNT_OF 			Counter overflow for PerfCnt[5:0] 	RO

In the code, bit GLOBAL_STATUS_LBRS_FROZEN is handled and cleared before
we reach my changes

That said, your approach is almost similar to what I did, and I will be happy
to change in order to make the code clearer.

> +	status &= ~AMD_PMU_V2_GLOBAL_STATUS_RESERVED;
> 	if (!status)
> 		goto done;
> 
> ?
> 
> Aside from being reserved, why are these bits magically set all of a
> sudden?

That is probably a question to AMD.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ