linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 22/26] dt-bindings: devfreq: event: rockchip,dfi: Add rk3588 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230616-swimwear-prewar-f9dce761d2ec@spud>
Date:   Fri, 16 Jun 2023 20:05:33 +0100
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To:     Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 22/26] dt-bindings: devfreq: event: rockchip,dfi: Add
 rk3588 support

On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 08:20:57AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> This adds rockchip,rk3588-dfi to the list of compatibles. Unlike ealier
> SoCs the rk3588 has four interrupts (one for each channel) instead of
> only one, so increase the number of allowed interrupts to four.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230524083153.2046084-23-s.hauer@pengutronix.de

It's unclear what the point of this link is.
My comment still stands about whether only the new compatible should be
permitted to have more than one interrupt. I don't recall a response to
that question on the last version.

Cheers,
Conor.

> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     Changes since v4:
>     - new patch
>     
>     Changes since v5:
>     - drop interrupt-names property
>     
>     Changes since v4:
>     - new patch
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/devfreq/event/rockchip,dfi.yaml       | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/event/rockchip,dfi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/event/rockchip,dfi.yaml
> index e8b64494ee8bd..50d3fabe958d5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/event/rockchip,dfi.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/event/rockchip,dfi.yaml
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ properties:
>      enum:
>        - rockchip,rk3399-dfi
>        - rockchip,rk3568-dfi
> +      - rockchip,rk3588-dfi
>  
>    clocks:
>      maxItems: 1
> @@ -23,7 +24,8 @@ properties:
>        - const: pclk_ddr_mon
>  
>    interrupts:
> -    maxItems: 1
> +    minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 4
>  
>    reg:
>      maxItems: 1
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)