[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230621070905.GM18491@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:09:05 +0200
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@...il.com>
Cc: linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/26] Add perf support to the rockchip-dfi driver
Hi Vincent,
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 01:50:42PM +0000, Vincent Legoll wrote:
> Hello Sascha,
>
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 6:22 AM Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> > - Add more reviewed-by tags
>
> Can you explain how the Tested-Bys are handled, I don't see any patch
> with those tags, not Sebastians, nor mine. Is the testing useful ? Should I
> retest the new patchset ?
I really appreciate that you are testing this series. However, changes
to the series often invlidate the testing, that's why I haven't added
your tested-by tags when sending a new series. The tested-by tags would
have to be collected from the person finally applying the series.
Regards,
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists