linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kselftest/alsa: Increase kselftest timeout

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Jun 2023 09:10:39 +0200
From:   Ricardo Cañuelo <ricardo.canuelo@...labora.com>
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Nícolas F. R. A. Prado 
        <nfraprado@...labora.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        kernel@...labora.com, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kselftest/alsa: Increase kselftest timeout


Hi Shuah,

Gentle ping for this

On lun, may 15 2023 at 11:43:10, Ricardo Cañuelo <ricardo.canuelo@...labora.com> wrote:
> Is there a downside to that? There'll be some tests that take more time,
> I don't think that's a problem with the tests or a reason to let them
> timeout. IMO it's the test framework which should adapt to the needs of
> different types of tests, and the solution provided by this patch is
> good enough, it addresses the problem for this particular test suite.
>
> If the solution is still unacceptable, do you have an alternative
> proposal in mind that we can try to implement?

There are some tests failing because of this and we're trying to address
these problems to clean up the regression results.

Thanks,
Ricardo