[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <755077.1687109321@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2023 18:28:41 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 10/17] nvme: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> struct bio_vec bvec;
> struct msghdr msg = { .msg_flags = MSG_SPLICE_PAGES | ... };
>
> ..
>
> bvec_set_virt
> iov_iter_bvec
> sock_sendmsg
>
> is a frequent pattern. Does it make sense to define a wrapper? Same for bvec_set_page.
I dunno. I'm trying to move towards aggregating multiple pages in a bvec
before calling sendmsg if possible rather than doing it one page at a time,
but it's easier and more obvious in some places than others.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists