linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] parport_pc: don't allow driver for SPARC32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 18 Jun 2023 19:35:17 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
Cc:     Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
        Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-parport@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] parport_pc: don't allow driver for SPARC32



On 6/18/23 18:29, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> Hi Randy,
> 
>>>  What happened to DaveM?
>>
>> I haven't seen him merge any arch/sparc/ patches lately.
>> I have a couple that are still pending.
> 
>  Oh, I hope he's been doing good then, and it's just a change of life 
> priorities or suchlike.  Patch reviews can take a lot of mental effort, 
> and I can't claim I've been as effective as I wished to with stuff that 
> lands on my plate either.
> 
>>>  In any case after a couple of iterations I have made a succesful build of 
>>> a 32-bit SPARC toolchain now, which I was able to verify a fix with I have 
>>
>> Is your newly built toolchain for riscv hosting?
> 
>  Are you asking whether the SPARC toolchain has been built/installed on a 
> RISC-V system?  If so, then no, it hasn't.  It runs on POWER9.

Yes, that's what I was asking.
So you could have used the compilers that Arnd builds:
  https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/

Thanks.
-- 
~Randy