lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 19 Jun 2023 13:01:07 +0200
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@...s.st.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...s.st.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>,
        Xiang wangx <wangxiang@...rlc.com>,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: mmc: mmci: Add st,stm32mp25-sdmmc2 compatible

On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 at 09:29, Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@...s.st.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/15/23 20:51, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 5:19 PM Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@...s.st.com> wrote:
> >
> >>>         - description: Entry for STMicroelectronics variant of PL18x.
> >>>             This dedicated compatible is used by bootloaders.
> > (...)
> >>>         - description: Entry for STMicroelectronics variant of PL18x for
> >>>             STM32MP25. This dedicated compatible is used by bootloaders.
> > (...)
> >>> Should I remove (or adapt) both descriptions?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> At the time the patch was done it was really just used by bootloaders.
> >> But as it is now used in the driver for delay block, I should remove the
> >> second sentence.
> >
> > Remove both.
> >
> > After "This dedicated compatible is used by bootloaders" there is
> > an implicit "in the SDK provided by ST Microelectronics", and that
> > is of no concern for DT bindings, which are (well, in theory) used by
> > e.g. BSD or other operating systems and who knows what they will
> > use and not, we don't put Linux specifics in there, neither Boot
> > loader specifics nor ST SDK specifics.
> >
> > At least that is the little bureaucratic ambition we have.
> >
> > Yours,
> > Linus Walleij
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for all the reviews.
> I'll update this patch in the v2, removing bootloader line and using enum.
>
> Ulf, should I send the new series now, or do you prefer to review the
> whole series before?

Actually I have already looked through the series and it looks good to
me! Please submit a new version so we can get this queued up for v6.5.

Kind regards
Uffe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ