linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: mmc: mmci: Add st,stm32mp25-sdmmc2 compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <78f8bd3d-c4a7-7383-441d-69cd8f5c30fb@foss.st.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Jun 2023 09:29:16 +0200
From:   Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@...s.st.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...s.st.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>,
        Xiang wangx <wangxiang@...rlc.com>,
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: mmc: mmci: Add st,stm32mp25-sdmmc2
 compatible

On 6/15/23 20:51, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 5:19 PM Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@...s.st.com> wrote:
> 
>>>         - description: Entry for STMicroelectronics variant of PL18x.
>>>             This dedicated compatible is used by bootloaders.
> (...)
>>>         - description: Entry for STMicroelectronics variant of PL18x for
>>>             STM32MP25. This dedicated compatible is used by bootloaders.
> (...)
>>> Should I remove (or adapt) both descriptions?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> At the time the patch was done it was really just used by bootloaders.
>> But as it is now used in the driver for delay block, I should remove the
>> second sentence.
> 
> Remove both.
> 
> After "This dedicated compatible is used by bootloaders" there is
> an implicit "in the SDK provided by ST Microelectronics", and that
> is of no concern for DT bindings, which are (well, in theory) used by
> e.g. BSD or other operating systems and who knows what they will
> use and not, we don't put Linux specifics in there, neither Boot
> loader specifics nor ST SDK specifics.
> 
> At least that is the little bureaucratic ambition we have.
> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

Hi,

Thanks for all the reviews.
I'll update this patch in the v2, removing bootloader line and using enum.

Ulf, should I send the new series now, or do you prefer to review the 
whole series before?


Yann