linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: mediatek: correct voltages for MT7622 and MT7623

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230619042355.hbprbr7kty5uznja@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Mon, 19 Jun 2023 09:53:55 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc:     Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@...iatek.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: mediatek: correct voltages for MT7622 and MT7623

On 06-06-23, 09:41, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 05/06/23 16:18, Daniel Golle ha scritto:
> > The MT6380 regulator typically used together with MT7622 does not
> > support the current maximum processor and SRAM voltage in the cpufreq
> > driver (1360000uV).
> > For MT7622 limit processor and SRAM supply voltages to 1350000uV to
> > avoid having the tracking algorithm request unsupported voltages from
> > the regulator.
> > 
> > On MT7623 there is no separate SRAM supply and the maximum voltage used
> > is 1300000uV. Create dedicated platform data for MT7623 to cover that
> > case as well.
> > 
> > Fixes: 0883426fd07e3 ("cpufreq: mediatek: Raise proc and sram max voltage for MT7622/7623")
> > Suggested-by: Jia-wei Chang <Jia-wei.Chang@...iatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
> 
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>

Applied. Thanks.

-- 
viresh