[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZJHTYUrKA/mclxRZ@swahl-home.5wahls.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 11:27:41 -0500
From: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>
To: Xin Li <xin3.li@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, steve.wahl@....com,
dimitri.sivanich@....com, russ.anderson@....com,
dvhart@...radead.org, andy@...radead.org, joro@...tes.org,
suravee.suthikulpanit@....com, will@...nel.org,
robin.murphy@....com, kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com,
wei.liu@...nel.org, decui@...rosoft.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org, acme@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, seanjc@...gle.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
jgg@...pe.ca, yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/vector: Rename send_cleanup_vector() to
vector_schedule_cleanup()
Reviewed-by: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 04:16:09PM -0700, Xin Li wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> Rename send_cleanup_vector() to vector_schedule_cleanup() for the next
> patch to replace vector cleanup IPI with a timer callback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Li <xin3.li@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h | 4 ++--
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c | 8 ++++----
> arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_irq.c | 2 +-
> drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c | 2 +-
> drivers/iommu/hyperv-iommu.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> index d465ece58151..551829884734 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> @@ -97,10 +97,10 @@ extern struct irq_cfg *irqd_cfg(struct irq_data *irq_data);
> extern void lock_vector_lock(void);
> extern void unlock_vector_lock(void);
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> -extern void send_cleanup_vector(struct irq_cfg *);
> +extern void vector_schedule_cleanup(struct irq_cfg *);
> extern void irq_complete_move(struct irq_cfg *cfg);
> #else
> -static inline void send_cleanup_vector(struct irq_cfg *c) { }
> +static inline void vector_schedule_cleanup(struct irq_cfg *c) { }
> static inline void irq_complete_move(struct irq_cfg *c) { }
> #endif
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> index c1efebd27e6c..aa370bd0d933 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> @@ -967,7 +967,7 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(sysvec_irq_move_cleanup)
> raw_spin_unlock(&vector_lock);
> }
>
> -static void __send_cleanup_vector(struct apic_chip_data *apicd)
> +static void __vector_schedule_cleanup(struct apic_chip_data *apicd)
> {
> unsigned int cpu;
>
> @@ -983,13 +983,13 @@ static void __send_cleanup_vector(struct apic_chip_data *apicd)
> raw_spin_unlock(&vector_lock);
> }
>
> -void send_cleanup_vector(struct irq_cfg *cfg)
> +void vector_schedule_cleanup(struct irq_cfg *cfg)
> {
> struct apic_chip_data *apicd;
>
> apicd = container_of(cfg, struct apic_chip_data, hw_irq_cfg);
> if (apicd->move_in_progress)
> - __send_cleanup_vector(apicd);
> + __vector_schedule_cleanup(apicd);
> }
>
> void irq_complete_move(struct irq_cfg *cfg)
> @@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ void irq_complete_move(struct irq_cfg *cfg)
> * on the same CPU.
> */
> if (apicd->cpu == smp_processor_id())
> - __send_cleanup_vector(apicd);
> + __vector_schedule_cleanup(apicd);
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_irq.c b/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_irq.c
> index ee21d6a36a80..4221259a5870 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_irq.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_irq.c
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ uv_set_irq_affinity(struct irq_data *data, const struct cpumask *mask,
> ret = parent->chip->irq_set_affinity(parent, mask, force);
> if (ret >= 0) {
> uv_program_mmr(cfg, data->chip_data);
> - send_cleanup_vector(cfg);
> + vector_schedule_cleanup(cfg);
> }
>
> return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
> index dc1ec6849775..b5900e70de60 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
> @@ -3658,7 +3658,7 @@ static int amd_ir_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data,
> * at the new destination. So, time to cleanup the previous
> * vector allocation.
> */
> - send_cleanup_vector(cfg);
> + vector_schedule_cleanup(cfg);
>
> return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/hyperv-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/hyperv-iommu.c
> index 8302db7f783e..8a5c17b97310 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/hyperv-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/hyperv-iommu.c
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static int hyperv_ir_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data,
> if (ret < 0 || ret == IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE)
> return ret;
>
> - send_cleanup_vector(cfg);
> + vector_schedule_cleanup(cfg);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static int hyperv_root_ir_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data,
> if (ret < 0 || ret == IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE)
> return ret;
>
> - send_cleanup_vector(cfg);
> + vector_schedule_cleanup(cfg);
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c
> index a1b987335b31..55d899f5a14b 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c
> @@ -1180,7 +1180,7 @@ intel_ir_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data, const struct cpumask *mask,
> * at the new destination. So, time to cleanup the previous
> * vector allocation.
> */
> - send_cleanup_vector(cfg);
> + vector_schedule_cleanup(cfg);
>
> return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE;
> }
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Steve Wahl, Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Powered by blists - more mailing lists