[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SA1PR11MB6734113E845FC51ED01CE4CBA85CA@SA1PR11MB6734.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 17:30:41 +0000
From: "Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org"
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
CC: "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"steve.wahl@....com" <steve.wahl@....com>,
"mike.travis@....com" <mike.travis@....com>,
"Sivanich, Dimitri" <dimitri.sivanich@....com>,
"Anderson, Russ" <russ.anderson@....com>,
"dvhart@...radead.org" <dvhart@...radead.org>,
"andy@...radead.org" <andy@...radead.org>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"kys@...rosoft.com" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
"haiyangz@...rosoft.com" <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
"Cui, Dexuan" <decui@...rosoft.com>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
"jolsa@...nel.org" <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"irogers@...gle.com" <irogers@...gle.com>,
"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"jiangshanlai@...il.com" <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
"jgg@...pe.ca" <jgg@...pe.ca>,
"yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn" <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/3] x86/vector: Replace IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR with a
timer callback
> > +/*
> > + * Called with vector_lock held
> > + */
>
> Such a comment is patently bad.
>
> > +static void __vector_cleanup(struct vector_cleanup *cl, bool
> > +check_irr)
> > {
> ....
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&vector_lock);
>
> Documents the requirement clearly _and_ catches any caller which does not hold
> the lock when lockdep is enabled.
Peter Z gave the same comment, I will address in the next iteration.
Thanks!
Xin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists