linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] dt-bindings: media: platform: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti Video Input Interface bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Jun 2023 08:54:31 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Yuji Ishikawa <yuji2.ishikawa@...hiba.co.jp>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>
Cc:     linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] dt-bindings: media: platform: visconti: Add
 Toshiba Visconti Video Input Interface bindings

On 20/06/2023 05:11, Yuji Ishikawa wrote:
> Adds the Device Tree binding documentation that allows to describe
> the Video Input Interface found in Toshiba Visconti SoCs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yuji Ishikawa <yuji2.ishikawa@...hiba.co.jp>
> Reviewed-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>
> ---
> Changelog v2:
> - no change
> 
> Changelog v3:
> - no change
> 
> Changelog v4:
> - fix style problems at the v3 patch
> - remove "index" member
> - update example
> 
> Changelog v5:
> - no change
> 
> Changelog v6:
> - add register definition of BUS-IF and MPU

You ignored the comments from v4->v5. I pointed this out. You still
ignored them.

You keep sending the same wrong patch ignoring review. This is not
acceptable.

NAK

Best regards,
Krzysztof