[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230620084210.GX4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 10:42:10 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Youling Tang <tangyouling@...ngson.cn>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com, chenzhongjin@...wei.com,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
tangyouling00@...il.com, youling.tang@...look.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/23] LoongArch: Add objtool and ORC unwinder
support
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 03:46:26PM +0800, Youling Tang wrote:
> This series of patches adds objtool and ORC unwinder support for
> LoongArch.
>
> Patch 01 - 07 are from "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" [1] with minor
> code tweaks. The "objtool: Reorganize ORC types" patch was not
> added, because LoongArch cannot share `strcut orc_entry`, it also
> needs to include ra_offset and ra_reg.
Yeah, I wish you would not have done that :-( I really don't like those
patches. I just don't much believe in that dynamic validation thing, and
doubly not for the patches you did pick not including any actual
rationale for it.
Also, the patches very much do not apply to tip/objtool/core,
specifically Josh recently reworked the reloc stuff quite dramatically.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists