[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+fNWbRLYx7gvF7q_AGdQOhRxgFnwMqnpZK91kkEEg=Uw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 10:44:08 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: "Duan,Muquan" <duanmuquan@...du.com>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"dsahern@...nel.org" <dsahern@...nel.org>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tcp: fix connection reset due to tw hashdance race.
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 5:30 AM Duan,Muquan <duanmuquan@...du.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Eric,
>
> Thanks for your comments!
>
> Why not speak of the FIN:
> For current implementation, hashdance can be done on state FIN_WAIT2, it may race with the ehash lookup process of passive closer’s FIN. My new patch 3 does the tw hashdance until receiving passive closer's FIN(real TIME_WAIT), so this race does not exist and the 'connection refused' issue will not occur, so I did not speak of the FIN again with the new patch.
>
shdance begins, the FIN may be dropped in further process if the sock
is destroyed on another CPU after hashdance.
>
> I took a look at FreeBSD, it uses hash table lock and per sock level lock.It also needs some tricks to retry for some cases, for example, sock dropped by another thread when waiting for per sock lock during the lookup:
> /*
> * While waiting for inp lock during the lookup, another thread
> * can have dropped the inpcb, in which case we need to loop back
> * and try to find a new inpcb to deliver to.
> */
> if (inp->inp_flags & INP_DROPPED) {
> INP_WUNLOCK(inp);
> inp = NULL;
> goto findpcb;
> }
>
This is the last time you bring FreeBSD code here.
We do not copy FreeBSD code for obvious reasons.
I never looked at FreeBSD code and never will.
Stop this, please, or I will ignore your future emails.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists