[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <168736259084.605458.4732376069158804322.b4-ty@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 16:51:43 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: will@...nel.org, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, chris@...kel.net, jcmvbkbc@...il.com,
steven.price@....com, vincenzo.frascino@....com,
leyfoon.tan@...rfivetech.com, mason.huo@...rfivetech.com,
jeeheng.sia@...rfivetech.com, conor.dooley@...rochip.com,
ajones@...tanamicro.com, Song Shuai <songshuaishuai@...ylab.org>
Cc: linux@...linux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH V2 0/4] Remove WARN_ON in save_processor_state
On Fri, 09 Jun 2023 15:50:45 +0800, Song Shuai wrote:
> During hibernation or restoration, freeze_secondary_cpus
> checks num_online_cpus via BUG_ON, and the subsequent
> save_processor_state also does the checking with WARN_ON.
>
> In the case of CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_SMP=n, freeze_secondary_cpus
> is not defined, but the sole possible condition to disable
> CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_SMP is !SMP where num_online_cpus is always 1.
> We also don't have to check it in save_processor_state.
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/misc), thanks!
I couldn't tell whether this series would go in as a whole but given
that the patches are independent, I picked up the arm64 one.
[2/4] arm64: hibernate: remove WARN_ON in save_processor_state
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/615af0021a61
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists