[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <083e29ff-4ad0-d05f-0521-56ace13629e6@grimberg.me>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:50:29 +0300
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
To: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
Cc: linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro@...tmail.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
James Smart <jsmart2021@...il.com>,
Martin Belanger <Martin.Belanger@...l.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests v1 1/3] nvme/048: Check for queue count check
directly
>>> +nvmf_wait_for_queue_count() {
>>> + local subsys_name="$1"
>>> + local queue_count="$2"
>>> + local nvmedev
>>> +
>>> + nvmedev=$(_find_nvme_dev "${subsys_name}")
>>> +
>>> + queue_count_file="/sys/class/nvme-fabrics/ctl/${nvmedev}/queue_count"
>>> +
>>> + nvmf_wait_for_state "${subsys_name}" "live" || return 1
>>> +
>>> + queue_count=$((queue_count + 1))
>>> + if grep -q "${queue_count}" "${queue_count_file}"; then
>>> + return 0
>>> + fi
>>> +
>>> + echo "expected queue count ${queue_count} not set"
>>> + return 1
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> set_nvmet_attr_qid_max() {
>>> local nvmet_subsystem="$1"
>>> local qid_max="$2"
>>> @@ -56,10 +76,7 @@ set_qid_max() {
>>> local qid_max="$3"
>>> set_nvmet_attr_qid_max "${subsys_name}" "${qid_max}"
>>> -
>>> - # Setting qid_max forces a disconnect and the reconntect attempt starts
>>> - nvmf_wait_for_state "${subsys_name}" "connecting" || return 1
>>> - nvmf_wait_for_state "${subsys_name}" "live" || return 1
>>> + nvmf_wait_for_queue_count "${subsys_name}" "${qid_max}" || return 1
>>
>> Why not simply wait for live? The connecting is obviously racy...
>
> That is what the new version is doing. It's waiting for the live state and then
> checks the queue count.
Maybe don't fold waiting for live into waiting for queue_count.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists