[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <h7m22wkkpxo524a73rhl6y55lh5jkjcdteasc7voc6m6e7vfvx@hbr7hfhfkf2k>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 13:19:31 +0200
From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Cc: linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro@...tmail.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
James Smart <jsmart2021@...il.com>,
Martin Belanger <Martin.Belanger@...l.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests v1 1/3] nvme/048: Check for queue count check
directly
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 12:50:29PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> > > Why not simply wait for live? The connecting is obviously racy...
> >
> > That is what the new version is doing. It's waiting for the live state and then
> > checks the queue count.
>
> Maybe don't fold waiting for live into waiting for queue_count.
Alright, will do!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists