[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6he5owg5e6h4vq5uwhw7jo3cncwrrlgjdxnq6csr5wlopbwk5c@l434fr2edukp>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 10:13:48 +0000
From: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@....com>
To: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
CC: "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
James Smart <jsmart2021@...il.com>,
Martin Belanger <Martin.Belanger@...l.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests v1 1/3] nvme/048: Check for queue count check
directly
On Jun 20, 2023 / 15:27, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> The test monitored the state changes live -> resetting -> connecting ->
> live, to figure out the queue count change was successful.
>
> The fc transport is reconnecting very fast and the state transitions
> are not observed by the current approach.
>
> So instead trying to monitor the state changes, let's just wait for the
> live state and the correct queue number.
>
> As queue count is depending on the number of online CPUs we explicitly
> use 1 and 2 for the max_queue count. This means the queue_count value
> needs to reach either 2 or 3 (admin queue included).
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
> ---
> tests/nvme/048 | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/nvme/048 b/tests/nvme/048
> index 81084f0440c2..3dc5169132de 100755
> --- a/tests/nvme/048
> +++ b/tests/nvme/048
> @@ -42,6 +42,26 @@ nvmf_wait_for_state() {
> return 0
> }
>
> +nvmf_wait_for_queue_count() {
> + local subsys_name="$1"
> + local queue_count="$2"
> + local nvmedev
> +
> + nvmedev=$(_find_nvme_dev "${subsys_name}")
> +
> + queue_count_file="/sys/class/nvme-fabrics/ctl/${nvmedev}/queue_count"
Nit: queue count file is not declared as a local variable.
> +
> + nvmf_wait_for_state "${subsys_name}" "live" || return 1
> +
> + queue_count=$((queue_count + 1))
> + if grep -q "${queue_count}" "${queue_count_file}"; then
Does this check work when the number in queue_count_file has more digits than
queue_count? e.g.) queue_count_file=20, queue_count=2
> + return 0
> + fi
> +
> + echo "expected queue count ${queue_count} not set"
> + return 1
> +}
> +
> set_nvmet_attr_qid_max() {
> local nvmet_subsystem="$1"
> local qid_max="$2"
> @@ -56,10 +76,7 @@ set_qid_max() {
> local qid_max="$3"
>
> set_nvmet_attr_qid_max "${subsys_name}" "${qid_max}"
> -
> - # Setting qid_max forces a disconnect and the reconntect attempt starts
> - nvmf_wait_for_state "${subsys_name}" "connecting" || return 1
> - nvmf_wait_for_state "${subsys_name}" "live" || return 1
> + nvmf_wait_for_queue_count "${subsys_name}" "${qid_max}" || return 1
>
> return 0
> }
> @@ -77,12 +94,8 @@ test() {
>
> _setup_nvmet
>
> - hostid="$(uuidgen)"
> - if [ -z "$hostid" ] ; then
> - echo "uuidgen failed"
> - return 1
> - fi
> - hostnqn="nqn.2014-08.org.nvmexpress:uuid:${hostid}"
> + hostid="${def_hostid}"
> + hostnqn="${def_hostnqn}"
I guess it's the better to move this hunk to the 3rd patch. Or we can mention it
in the commit message of this patch.
>
> truncate -s "${nvme_img_size}" "${file_path}"
>
> @@ -103,7 +116,7 @@ test() {
> echo FAIL
> else
> set_qid_max "${port}" "${subsys_name}" 1 || echo FAIL
> - set_qid_max "${port}" "${subsys_name}" 128 || echo FAIL
> + set_qid_max "${port}" "${subsys_name}" 2 || echo FAIL
> fi
>
> _nvme_disconnect_subsys "${subsys_name}"
> --
> 2.41.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists