[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230622082854.2767ujlhpzgejqn2@blmsp>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 10:28:54 +0200
From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Chun-Jie Chen <chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com>,
Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@...iatek.com>,
Fabien Parent <parent.f@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/8] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Move bools to a flags
field
Hi Angelo,
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 11:32:18AM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 19/06/23 10:53, Markus Schneider-Pargmann ha scritto:
> > To simplify the macros, use a flags field for simple bools. This is in
> > preparation for more flags.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c | 6 +++---
> > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h | 19 +++++++++++--------
> > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> > index 354249cc1b12..aa9ab413479e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> > @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static int _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd, st
> > if (!mask)
> > break;
> > - if (bpd[i].bus_prot_reg_update)
> > + if (bpd[i].flags & BUS_PROT_REG_UPDATE)
> > regmap_set_bits(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_set, mask);
> > else
> > regmap_write(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_set, mask);
> > @@ -165,12 +165,12 @@ static int _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
> > if (!mask)
> > continue;
> > - if (bpd[i].bus_prot_reg_update)
> > + if (bpd[i].flags & BUS_PROT_REG_UPDATE)
> > regmap_clear_bits(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_clr, mask);
> > else
> > regmap_write(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_clr, mask);
> > - if (bpd[i].ignore_clr_ack)
> > + if (bpd[i].flags & BUS_PROT_IGNORE_CLR_ACK)
> > continue;
> > ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_sta,
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> > index 5ec53ee073c4..e26c8c317a6b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> > @@ -42,23 +42,27 @@
> > #define SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA 6
> > -#define _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, _update, _ignore) { \
> > +enum scpsys_bus_prot_flags {
> > + BUS_PROT_REG_UPDATE = BIT(1),
> > + BUS_PROT_IGNORE_CLR_ACK = BIT(2),
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, _flags) { \
> > .bus_prot_mask = (_mask), \
> > .bus_prot_set = _set, \
> > .bus_prot_clr = _clr, \
> > .bus_prot_sta = _sta, \
> > - .bus_prot_reg_update = _update, \
> > - .ignore_clr_ack = _ignore, \
> > + .flags = _flags \
> > }
> > #define BUS_PROT_WR(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta) \
> > - _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, false, false)
> > + _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, 0)
> > #define BUS_PROT_WR_IGN(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta) \
> > - _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, false, true)
> > + _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, BUS_PROT_IGNORE_CLR_ACK)
> > #define BUS_PROT_UPDATE(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta) \
> > - _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, true, false)
> > + _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, BUS_PROT_REG_UPDATE)
> > #define BUS_PROT_UPDATE_TOPAXI(_mask) \
> > BUS_PROT_UPDATE(_mask, \
> > @@ -71,8 +75,7 @@ struct scpsys_bus_prot_data {
> > u32 bus_prot_set;
> > u32 bus_prot_clr;
> > u32 bus_prot_sta;
> > - bool bus_prot_reg_update;
> > - bool ignore_clr_ack;
> > + u32 flags;
>
> As far as I understand, we don't expect more than six bits to be populated as bus
> protection flags, so we can save some memory by changing that to u8...
Thank you. Yes, also we can change it later if we need more flags at
some point. I will change it. But I guess it won't save any memory as
the compiler probably aligns the struct.
Best,
Markus
>
> ...after which:
>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>
> Regards,
> Angelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists