linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: qcom: Document new msm8916-samsung devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230622144007.GA1662197-robh@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 22 Jun 2023 08:40:07 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Lin, Meng-Bo" <linmengbo0689@...tonmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: qcom: Document new msm8916-samsung
 devices

On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:31:24AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 22/06/2023 02:03, Lin, Meng-Bo wrote:
> > Document the new following device tree bindings used in their
> > device trees:
> > 
> > - samsung,fortuna3g
> > - samsung,fortunaltezt
> > - samsung,gprimeltecan
> > - samsung,grandprimelte
> > - samsung,heatqlte
> > - samsung,rossa
> 
> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
> and lists to CC.  It might happen, that command when run on an older
> kernel, gives you outdated entries.  Therefore please be sure you base
> your patches on recent Linux kernel.
> 
> You missed at least DT list (maybe more), so this won't be tested by our
> tools. Performing review on untested code might be a waste of time, thus
> I will skip this patch entirely till you follow the process allowing the
> patch to be tested.
> 
> Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.
> 
> You just ignored maintainers entirely... It's not even about testing but
> no one would apply it.

Something strange going on with this one as it still made it to the DT 
patchwork, so it did go to the DT list. Must have been Bcc'ed.

The patches are also quoted-printable encoded which shouldn't be used.

Rob