linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: qcom: Document new msm8916-samsung devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Jun 2023 17:04:32 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Lin, Meng-Bo" <linmengbo0689@...tonmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: qcom: Document new msm8916-samsung
 devices

On 22/06/2023 16:40, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:31:24AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 22/06/2023 02:03, Lin, Meng-Bo wrote:
>>> Document the new following device tree bindings used in their
>>> device trees:
>>>
>>> - samsung,fortuna3g
>>> - samsung,fortunaltezt
>>> - samsung,gprimeltecan
>>> - samsung,grandprimelte
>>> - samsung,heatqlte
>>> - samsung,rossa
>>
>> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
>> and lists to CC.  It might happen, that command when run on an older
>> kernel, gives you outdated entries.  Therefore please be sure you base
>> your patches on recent Linux kernel.
>>
>> You missed at least DT list (maybe more), so this won't be tested by our
>> tools. Performing review on untested code might be a waste of time, thus
>> I will skip this patch entirely till you follow the process allowing the
>> patch to be tested.
>>
>> Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.
>>
>> You just ignored maintainers entirely... It's not even about testing but
>> no one would apply it.
> 
> Something strange going on with this one as it still made it to the DT 
> patchwork, so it did go to the DT list. Must have been Bcc'ed.
> 
> The patches are also quoted-printable encoded which shouldn't be used.

Maybe hidden feature of protonmail... Although other mails in the thread
were sent to everyone.

Best regards,
Krzysztof