linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tpm: Ensure that tpm chip has ops to check if it's defective

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Jun 2023 08:42:08 -0500
From:   "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@....com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     peterhuewe@....de, jarkko@...nel.org, jgg@...pe.ca,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: Ensure that tpm chip has ops to check if it's
 defective


On 6/23/2023 1:08 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:04:27PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> The ibmvtpm doesn't have `chip->ops` set, and so trying to check
>> if it's a defective AMD fTPM doesn't work.
>>
>> Add an extra check to tpm_amd_is_rng_defective() to ensure the
>> TPM being checked has `chip->ops`.
>>
>> Cc: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
>> Reported-by: Aneesh Kumar K. V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
>> Reported-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.ibm.com>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/99B81401-DB46-49B9-B321-CF832B50CAC3@linux.ibm.com/
>> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.ibm.com>
>> Fixes: bd8621ca1510 ("tpm: Add !tpm_amd_is_rng_defective() to the hwrng_unregister() call site")
>> Fixes: f1324bbc4011 ("tpm: disable hwrng for fTPM on some AMD designs")
>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 3 +++
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> No cc: stable on that list above?

Good point, my mistake on that miss.

If Jarkko agrees with the direction of this patch, I think
it can be added while committing.

Thanks!