linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] refactor file signing program

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Jun 2023 20:30:22 +0530
From:   Shreenidhi Shedi <yesshedi@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sshedi@...are.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] refactor file signing program

On Thu, 1-Jun-2023 14:38, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 02:33:23PM +0530, Shreenidhi Shedi wrote:
>> On Wed, 31-May-2023 22:20, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 09:01:24PM +0530, Shreenidhi Shedi wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 31-May-2023 20:08, Greg KH wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 04:14:49PM +0530, Shreenidhi Shedi wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 22-Mar-2023 01:03, Shreenidhi Shedi wrote:
>>>>>> Can you please review the latest patch series? I think I have addressed your
>>>>>> concerns. Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> The big question is, "who is going to use these new features"?  This
>>>>> tool is only used by the in-kernel build scripts, and if they do not
>>>>> take advantage of these new options you have added, why are they needed?
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> greg k-h
>>>>
>>>> Hi Greg,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the response.
>>>>
>>>> We use it in VMware Photon OS. Following is the link for the same.
>>>> https://github.com/vmware/photon/blob/master/SPECS/linux/spec_install_post.inc#L4
>>>>
>>>> If this change goes in, it will give a slight push to our build performance.
>>>
>>> What exactly do you mean by "slight push"?
>>
>> Instead of invoking the signing tool binary for each module, we can pass
>> modules in bulk and it will reduce the build time by couple of seconds.
> 
> Then why not modify the in-kernel build system to also do this, allowing
> everyone to save time and money (i.e. energy)?
> 
> Why keep the build savings to yourself?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

You are correct. Sorry, I got busy with some other work.
Thanks for the inputs Greg. I sent a patch for the same, please take a look.

-- 
Shedi