[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d990a281-b4a3-1e26-1fdf-dfd35ab9cd24@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2023 12:17:33 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@....com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
shenwei.wang@....com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-imx@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: serial: fsl-lpuart: add imx8ulp
compatible string
On 25/06/2023 11:48, Sherry Sun wrote:
> LPUART driver adds a new compatible string for imx8ulp, and imx93 is
What driver adds or not, is not really correct argument for
compatibility. There are plenty of compatible devices which have both
device ID entries in the driver. Why would you drop their compatibility
between each other? It does not work like that... Provide clear
rationale for this.
> much more compatible with imx8ulp than imx7ulp, so correct the
> dt-binding here.
>
"Much more compatible" is too vague.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists