[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <41d0313b-f791-b274-d5a2-fd40b4be0fea@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2023 12:13:45 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@....com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
shenwei.wang@....com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-imx@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: imx8ulp: remove "fsl,imx7ulp-lpuart"
compatible for i.MX8ULP
On 25/06/2023 11:48, Sherry Sun wrote:
> i.MX8ULP has specific "fsl,imx8ulp-lpuart" compatible in lpuart driver,
> "fsl,imx7ulp-lpuart" compatible is no longer needed, and i.MX8ULP is not
> fully compatible with i.MX7ULP, for example, i.MX8ulp can support
> EOP(end-of-packet) function while i.MX7ulp doesn't, so remove
> "fsl,imx7ulp-lpuart" compatible.
That's not how compatibility works. Your commit msg says that new device
comes with new features, but your code says they are incompatible. These
are two different things.
Either drop the patch or provide correct rationale.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists