[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230625231454d53ad0e0@mail.local>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 01:14:54 +0200
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: Valentin Caron <valentin.caron@...s.st.com>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@...s.st.com>,
Christophe Guibout <christophe.guibout@...s.st.com>,
Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com>,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] rtc: stm32: improve rtc precision
On 15/06/2023 11:27:49+0200, Valentin Caron wrote:
> From: Christophe Guibout <christophe.guibout@...s.st.com>
>
> The rtc is used to update the stgen counter on wake up from
> low power modes, so it needs to be as much accurate as possible.
>
> The maximization of asynchronous divider leads to a 4ms rtc
> precision clock.
> By decreasing pred_a to 0, it will have pred_s=32767 (when
> need_accuracy is true), so stgen clock becomes more accurate
> with 30us precision.
> Nevertheless this will leads to an increase of power consumption.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Guibout <christophe.guibout@...s.st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Caron <valentin.caron@...s.st.com>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
> index bd7a59a07537..cad88668bcfb 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
> @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ struct stm32_rtc_data {
> void (*clear_events)(struct stm32_rtc *rtc, unsigned int flags);
> bool has_pclk;
> bool need_dbp;
> + bool need_accuracy;
> };
>
> struct stm32_rtc {
> @@ -545,6 +546,7 @@ static void stm32_rtc_clear_events(struct stm32_rtc *rtc,
> static const struct stm32_rtc_data stm32_rtc_data = {
> .has_pclk = false,
> .need_dbp = true,
> + .need_accuracy = false,
> .regs = {
> .tr = 0x00,
> .dr = 0x04,
> @@ -566,6 +568,7 @@ static const struct stm32_rtc_data stm32_rtc_data = {
> static const struct stm32_rtc_data stm32h7_rtc_data = {
> .has_pclk = true,
> .need_dbp = true,
> + .need_accuracy = false,
> .regs = {
> .tr = 0x00,
> .dr = 0x04,
> @@ -596,6 +599,7 @@ static void stm32mp1_rtc_clear_events(struct stm32_rtc *rtc,
> static const struct stm32_rtc_data stm32mp1_data = {
> .has_pclk = true,
> .need_dbp = false,
> + .need_accuracy = true,
> .regs = {
> .tr = 0x00,
> .dr = 0x04,
> @@ -636,11 +640,25 @@ static int stm32_rtc_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> pred_a_max = STM32_RTC_PRER_PRED_A >> STM32_RTC_PRER_PRED_A_SHIFT;
> pred_s_max = STM32_RTC_PRER_PRED_S >> STM32_RTC_PRER_PRED_S_SHIFT;
>
> - for (pred_a = pred_a_max; pred_a + 1 > 0; pred_a--) {
> - pred_s = (rate / (pred_a + 1)) - 1;
> + if (rate > (pred_a_max + 1) * (pred_s_max + 1)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "rtc_ck rate is too high: %dHz\n", rate);
What is the expect user action after seeing this message?
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (rtc->data->need_accuracy) {
> + for (pred_a = 0; pred_a <= pred_a_max; pred_a++) {
> + pred_s = (rate / (pred_a + 1)) - 1;
>
> - if (((pred_s + 1) * (pred_a + 1)) == rate)
> - break;
> + if (pred_s <= pred_s_max && ((pred_s + 1) * (pred_a + 1)) == rate)
> + break;
> + }
> + } else {
> + for (pred_a = pred_a_max; pred_a + 1 > 0; pred_a--) {
> + pred_s = (rate / (pred_a + 1)) - 1;
> +
> + if (((pred_s + 1) * (pred_a + 1)) == rate)
> + break;
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists