[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZJn7Fm4OI1ySPHZg@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 10:54:46 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
fuyuanli@...iglobal.com, zwp10758@...il.com, zyhtheonly@...il.com,
zyhtheonly@...h.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched/isolation: add a workqueue parameter onto
isolcpus to constrain unbound CPUs
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:22:17AM +0800, tiozhang wrote:
> Motivation of doing this is to better improve boot times for devices when
> we want to prevent our workqueue works from running on some specific CPUs,
> i,e, some CPUs are busy with interrupts.
>
> Also remove HK_FLAG_WQ from nohz_full to prevent nohz_full overriding
> workqueue's cpu config.
>
> Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: tiozhang <tiozhang@...iglobal.com>
Let's just do the workqueue specific parameter. I'll apply the other one to
the workqueue branch after the merge window.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists