[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51f58d51-d5bf-79a2-a32a-e6849a118123@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 15:50:48 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/misc for 6.5
On 6/27/2023 3:43 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 at 15:25, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> I don't know what the rules are - and some of the functions you test
>> seem actively buggy (ie not handling alignment right etc).
>
> Oh. And you *only* test the 40-byte case. That seems a bit bogus.
>
> If I change the packet size from 40 to 1500, I get
>
> 02: 185.1 / 186.4 cycles (8b414316) Upcoming linux kernel version
> 04: 184.9 / 186.5 cycles (8b414316) Specialized to size 40
> 06: 107.3 / 117.2 cycles (8b414316) New version
> 22: 185.6 / 186.5 cycles (8b414316) Odd-alignment handling removed
>
> which seems unexpectedly bad for the other versions.
>
I'm not surprised though; running 2 parallel streams (where one stream has a fixed zero as input,
so can run OOO any time) .. can really have a performance change like this
Powered by blists - more mailing lists