[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5c384322-5321-f3c5-f0c5-0558c344eef5@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 10:28:22 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Stanley Chang <stanley_chang@...ltek.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
Ray Chi <raychi@...gle.com>,
Flavio Suligoi <f.suligoi@...m.it>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] dt-bindings: phy: realtek: Add the doc about the
Realtek SoC USB 2.0 PHY
On 27/06/2023 10:20, Stanley Chang wrote:
> Add the documentation explain the property about Realtek USB PHY driver.
>
> Realtek DHC (digital home center) RTD SoCs support DWC3 XHCI USB
> controller. Added the driver to drive the USB 2.0 PHY transceivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanley Chang <stanley_chang@...ltek.com>
> ---
> v4 to v5 change:
> 1. Add more examples.
Not more examples. Just give one or two relevant examples.
> 2. Remove the compatible realtek,usb2phy.
> 3. Revise the descriptor of the property.
> 4. Add the default of the property.
...
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - "#phy-cells"
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + usb_port0_usb2phy: usb-phy@...14 {
Drop also the labels.
> + compatible = "realtek,rtd1319d-usb2phy";
> + reg = <0x13214 0x4>, <0x28280 0x4>;
> + #phy-cells = <0>;
> + nvmem-cells = <&otp_usb_port0_dc_cal>, <&otp_usb_port0_dc_dis>;
> + nvmem-cell-names = "usb-dc-cal", "usb-dc-dis";
> +
> + realtek,driving-level = <0xe>;
Why keeping this example? I asked to grow it and instead there are two
more. Just keep one describing as much as possible. Second is useful if
you have there different properties.
Your third is almost the same as second, so no need for it at all.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists