[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CTNAIDCV0BIO.2JMX8MXEQ197U@otso>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 10:29:30 +0200
From: "Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
"Andy Gross" <agross@...nel.org>,
"Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@...nel.org>,
"Konrad Dybcio" <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
"Alim Akhtar" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"Avri Altman" <avri.altman@....com>,
"Bart Van Assche" <bvanassche@....org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"Iskren Chernev" <me@...ren.info>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@...nel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht>,
<phone-devel@...r.kernel.org>, "Eric Biggers" <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Fix sm8450 bindings
On Mon Jun 26, 2023 at 10:27 AM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 26/06/2023 10:15, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > SM8450 actually supports ICE (Inline Crypto Engine) so adjust the
> > bindings and the example to match.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Iskren Chernev <me@...ren.info>
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
>
> SM8450 should be rather converted to qcom,ice.
In v5 sm8450 is now using ICE, both in dtsi and binding example. But I
guess you could also argue reg-names should be purged from dtsi and
binding completely and to convert all existing dtsi to use the
standalone ice node, right?
But I'd also like for this series to finally land at some point, we can
do this later, okay?
Regards
Luca
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists