[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CTNAIROO2XIU.3FFYTSQL4OIM7@otso>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 10:30:01 +0200
From: "Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
"Andy Gross" <agross@...nel.org>,
"Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@...nel.org>,
"Konrad Dybcio" <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
"Alim Akhtar" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"Avri Altman" <avri.altman@....com>,
"Bart Van Assche" <bvanassche@....org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"Iskren Chernev" <me@...ren.info>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@...nel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht>,
<phone-devel@...r.kernel.org>, "Eric Biggers" <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add reg-names property
for ICE
On Mon Jun 26, 2023 at 10:26 AM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 26/06/2023 10:15, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > The code in ufs-qcom-ice.c needs the ICE reg to be named "ice". Add this
> > in the bindings so the existing dts can validate successfully.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Iskren Chernev <me@...ren.info>
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
> > index eb3de2fde6b0..b5fc686cb3a1 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
> > @@ -80,6 +80,10 @@ properties:
> > minItems: 1
> > maxItems: 2
> >
> > + reg-names:
> > + minItems: 1
> > + maxItems: 2
> > +
> > required-opps:
> > maxItems: 1
> >
> > @@ -135,6 +139,8 @@ allOf:
> > reg:
> > minItems: 1
> > maxItems: 1
> > + reg-names:
> > + maxItems: 1
>
> I see I reviewed, but I don't think the patch is correct. It allows any
> reg-names. I think my advice from v1 was not understood. The names
> should be defined in top-level.
Thanks for your review, I hope it's resolved in v5 of this series.
Please check :)
Regards
Luca
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists