[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ea32af9-406e-f6fe-1df1-a5988015dbb0@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 15:44:21 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Iskren Chernev <me@...ren.info>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Fix sm8450 bindings
On 27/06/2023 10:29, Luca Weiss wrote:
> On Mon Jun 26, 2023 at 10:27 AM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 26/06/2023 10:15, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>> SM8450 actually supports ICE (Inline Crypto Engine) so adjust the
>>> bindings and the example to match.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Iskren Chernev <me@...ren.info>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
>>
>> SM8450 should be rather converted to qcom,ice.
>
> In v5 sm8450 is now using ICE, both in dtsi and binding example. But I
> guess you could also argue reg-names should be purged from dtsi and
> binding completely and to convert all existing dtsi to use the
> standalone ice node, right?
It would be good, but that's no exactly my goal. My goal is to have
dtbs_check without errors.
>
> But I'd also like for this series to finally land at some point, we can
> do this later, okay?
I need to look at v5 then.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists