[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230627112220.229240-2-david@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 13:22:16 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/5] mm/memory_hotplug: check for fatal signals only in offline_pages()
Let's check for fatal signals only. That looks cleaner and still keeps
the documented use case for manual user-space triggered memory offlining
working. From Documentation/admin-guide/mm/memory-hotplug.rst:
% timeout $TIMEOUT offline_block | failure_handling
In fact, we even document there: "the offlining context can be terminated
by sending a fatal signal".
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
---
mm/memory_hotplug.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index 8e0fa209d533..0d2151df4ee1 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1879,7 +1879,7 @@ int __ref offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
do {
pfn = start_pfn;
do {
- if (signal_pending(current)) {
+ if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
ret = -EINTR;
reason = "signal backoff";
goto failed_removal_isolated;
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists