[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZJw9EsEzQbo3pj0C@ziepe.ca>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 11:00:50 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v6.5
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 06:46:50AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> The revert meant that 0-day didn't see -rcu without the single-argument
> kfree_rcu() definition.
0-day is also supposed to run on your branches, not just linux-next,
at least it does for my trees..
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists