linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v6.5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <38f30730-3099-45fd-a38b-d3e2fc679737@paulmck-laptop>
Date:   Wed, 28 Jun 2023 09:21:24 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
        mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v6.5

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 11:00:50AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 06:46:50AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> 
> > The revert meant that 0-day didn't see -rcu without the single-argument
> > kfree_rcu() definition.
> 
> 0-day is also supposed to run on your branches, not just linux-next,
> at least it does for my trees..

It did complain back in February, but for whatever reason has not
complained about the lack fo single-argumen kfree_rcu() since then.

							Thanx, Paul