[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cgo97jJTTTV7F2kJ=sF9MBoRwegN4r0dWotbUD=Nr1_cQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 15:03:55 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, acme@...nel.org,
masahiroy@...nel.org, leo.yan@...aro.org, broonie@...nel.org,
Aishwarya.TCV@....com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/1] perf tools: Add a place to put kernel config
fragments for test runs
Hi James,
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 3:53 AM James Clark <james.clark@....com> wrote:
>
> Changes since RFC:
>
> * Changed arch filename convention to use the ARCH= build time values
> instead of uname
>
> It seems like there were no objections on the RFC, apart from maybe
> changing the perf tests to run as a kself test. But that's probably not
> going to happen for a while, if ever, and these fragments can always
> be moved in that case.
I missed the RFC, sorry. Could you please add a link for that?
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> James Clark (1):
> perf tools: Add a place to put kernel config fragments for test runs
>
> tools/perf/tests/config-fragments/README | 7 +++++++
> tools/perf/tests/config-fragments/arm64 | 1 +
> tools/perf/tests/config-fragments/config | 11 +++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/config-fragments/README
> create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/config-fragments/arm64
> create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/config-fragments/config
>
>
> base-commit: ad5f604e186ac08d12c401e34ea96c09c38ddbc5
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists