[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7ciBWjNHOfouNKSFy2q88Cs4-6F8EjGqGpFdwb6QTShaew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 15:08:30 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com, shangxiaojing@...wei.com,
zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com, qiangqing.zhang@....com,
kjain@...ux.ibm.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/9] perf tool: sys event metric support re-write
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 3:30 AM John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> The current sys event metric support has some issues, like:
> - It is broken that we only match a metric based on PMU compat, but not
> Unit as well, as reported by Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com>
> - No real self-test support
> - Not able to use resolvable metrics
> - Need to specify event PMU Unit and Compat for metric, which should not
> be necessary
>
> This series changes sys event metric support to match metrics based on
> evaluating each term in the metric expression and then ensuring it
> matches an event from the same associated pmu_sys_events table.
>
> Why an RFC?
> - Even though main motivation here was to improve self-test support, that
> has proved quite tricky and nothing has been added yet.
> My desire is to test the feature that we match metrics for a specific
> SoC when PMUs with matching HW identifier are present. So I would hope
> to add sys metrics for many SoCs in ../pmu-events/arch/test/
> - I still need to suppress logs from metricgroup_sys_metric_supported()
> indirect calls to functions like parse_events_multi_pmu_add(),
> generating logs like
> "smmuv3_pmcg.wr_sent_sp -> smmuv3_pmcg_50/event=0x86/" - we should only
> see those logs for when really adding the metric in calling add_metric()
>
> Based on 82fe2e45cdb0 (acme/tmp.perf/core, acme/tmp.perf-tools-next, acme/perf/core, acme/perf-tools-next) perf pmus: Check if we can encode the PMU number in perf_event_attr.type
We moved to new repos from acme to perf/perf-tools and perf/perf-tools-next.
You'd better rebase the series onto perf-tools-next (branch name is the same).
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> John Garry (9):
> perf metrics: Delete metricgroup_add_iter_data.table
> perf metrics: Don't iter sys metrics if we already found a CPU match
> perf metrics: Pass cpu and sys tables to metricgroup__add_metric()
> perf jevents: Add sys_events_find_events_table()
> perf pmu: Refactor pmu_add_sys_aliases_iter_fn()
> perf metrics: Add metricgroup_sys_metric_supported()
> perf metrics: Test metric match in metricgroup__sys_event_iter()
> perf metrics: Stop metricgroup__add_metric_sys_event_iter if already
> matched
> perf vendor events arm64: Remove unnecessary metric Unit and Compat
> specifiers
>
> .../arm64/freescale/imx8mm/sys/metrics.json | 4 -
> .../arm64/freescale/imx8mn/sys/metrics.json | 4 -
> .../arm64/freescale/imx8mq/sys/metrics.json | 4 -
> .../arm64/hisilicon/hip09/sys/uncore-cpa.json | 4 -
> tools/perf/pmu-events/empty-pmu-events.c | 6 +
> tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.py | 11 ++
> tools/perf/pmu-events/pmu-events.h | 3 +
> tools/perf/tests/expand-cgroup.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c | 29 ++-
> tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c | 182 +++++++++++++++---
> tools/perf/util/metricgroup.h | 3 +-
> tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 20 +-
> tools/perf/util/pmu.h | 2 +
> 14 files changed, 220 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.35.3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists