linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs/vboxsf: Replace kmap() with kmap_local

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230629092844.GA456505@sumitra.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Jun 2023 02:28:44 -0700
From:   Sumitra Sharma <sumitraartsy@...il.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
        Fabio <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>, Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>,
        Sumitra Sharma <sumitraartsy@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/vboxsf: Replace kmap() with kmap_local_{page, folio}()

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 06:15:04PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Here's a more comprehensive read_folio patch.  It's not at all
> efficient, but then if we wanted an efficient vboxsf, we'd implement
> vboxsf_readahead() and actually do an async call with deferred setting
> of the uptodate flag.  I can consult with anyone who wants to do all
> this work.
> 
> I haven't even compiled this, just trying to show the direction this
> should take.
> 
> diff --git a/fs/vboxsf/file.c b/fs/vboxsf/file.c
> index 2307f8037efc..f1af9a7bd3d8 100644
> --- a/fs/vboxsf/file.c
> +++ b/fs/vboxsf/file.c
> @@ -227,26 +227,31 @@ const struct inode_operations vboxsf_reg_iops = {
>  
>  static int vboxsf_read_folio(struct file *file, struct folio *folio)
>  {
> -	struct page *page = &folio->page;
>  	struct vboxsf_handle *sf_handle = file->private_data;
> -	loff_t off = page_offset(page);
> -	u32 nread = PAGE_SIZE;
> -	u8 *buf;
> +	loff_t pos = folio_pos(folio);
> +	size_t offset = 0;
>  	int err;
>  
> -	buf = kmap(page);
> +	do {
> +		u8 *buf = kmap_local_folio(folio, offset);
> +		u32 nread = PAGE_SIZE;
>  
> -	err = vboxsf_read(sf_handle->root, sf_handle->handle, off, &nread, buf);
> -	if (err == 0) {
> -		memset(&buf[nread], 0, PAGE_SIZE - nread);
> -		flush_dcache_page(page);
> -		SetPageUptodate(page);
> -	} else {
> -		SetPageError(page);
> -	}
> +		err = vboxsf_read(sf_handle->root, sf_handle->handle, pos,
> +				&nread, buf);
> +		if (nread < PAGE_SIZE)
> +			memset(&buf[nread], 0, PAGE_SIZE - nread);
> +		kunmap_local(buf);
> +		if (err)
> +			break;
> +		offset += PAGE_SIZE;
> +		pos += PAGE_SIZE;
> +	} while (offset < folio_size(folio);
>  
> -	kunmap(page);
> -	unlock_page(page);
> +	if (!err) {
> +		flush_dcache_folio(folio);
> +		folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> +	}
> +	folio_unlock(folio);
>  	return err;
>  }
>

Hi 

So, after reading the comments, I understood that the problem presented 
by Hans and Matthew is as follows:

1) In the current code, the buffers used by vboxsf_write()/vboxsf_read() are 
translated to PAGELIST-s before passing to the hypervisor, 
but inefficiently— it first maps a page in vboxsf_read_folio() and then 
calls page_to_phys(virt_to_page()) in the function hgcm_call_init_linaddr(). 

The inefficiency in the current implementation arises due to the unnecessary 
mapping of a page in vboxsf_read_folio() because the mapping output, i.e. the 
linear address, is used deep down in file 'drivers/virt/vboxguest/vboxguest_utils.c'. 
Hence, the mapping must be done in this file; to do so, the folio must be passed 
until this point. It can be done by adding a new member, 'struct folio *folio', 
in the 'struct vmmdev_hgcm_function_parameter64'. 

The unused member 'phys_addr' in this struct can also be removed.

2) Expanding the vboxsf_read_folio so that it can handle larger folios.
Matthew already has suggested the changes, I have to read more on this.

Parallelly I will be setting up the testing environment to test the changes. 

Please let me know if I am wrong anywhere.

Thanks & regards
Sumitra