[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cf4f1ec3873b6c4b92ddb347d5bd3c2e2f03bf00.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 15:26:11 +0200
From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/44] treewide: Remove I/O port accessors for
HAS_IOPORT=n
On Tue, 2023-06-27 at 14:53 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023, at 11:12, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > On Mon, 2023-05-22 at 13:29 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >
> > > Maybe let's give it another week to have more maintainers pick
> > > up stuff from v5, and then send out a v6 as separate submissions.
> > >
> > > Arnd
> >
> > Hi Arnd and All,
> >
> > I'm sorry there hasn't been an updated in a long time and we're missing
> > v6.5. I've been quite busy with other work and life. Speaking of, I
> > will be mostly out for around a month starting some time mid to end
> > July as, if all goes well, I'm expecting to become a dad. That said, I
> > haven't forgotten about this and your overall plan of sending per-
> > subsystem patches sounds good, just haven't had the time to also
> > incorporate the feedback.
>
> Ok, thanks for letting us know. I just checked to see that about half
> of your series has already made it into linux-next and is likely to
> be part of v6.5 or already in v6.4.
>
> Maybe you can start out by taking a pass at just resending the ones
> that don't need any changes and can just get picked up after -rc1,
> and then I'll try to have a look at whatever remains after that.
>
> Arnd
Oh yeah looks better than I anticipated. I seem to have picked an odd
base commit for "tty: serial: .." because of which Greg couldn't apply
it so res-ending + rebase might be enough for that. By my count it
looks like only "usb: pci-quirksL ..." needs real work and possibly the
"drm: .." part though the discussion around cirrus doesn't look like it
would require much work. So I'll do rebase/re-send of the easy ones
tomorrow/next week.
Thanks,
Niklas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists